Explore La's Diverse Banking Scene: How Many Banks?

how many banks are in los angeles

Los Angeles is the second-largest city in the United States and is home to a large number of banks. However, despite the city's large population and economic significance, a significant number of neighbourhoods in Los Angeles County lack access to banks and credit unions, with nearly 600,000 residents across 46 neighbourhoods affected. This has led to the term banking deserts to describe areas that lack adequate access to financial institutions.

Characteristics Values
Number of banks in Los Angeles 50+
Number of branches operated by the 50 largest banks in Southern California 300+
Number of people employed by the 50 largest banks in Southern California 6400+
Total assets of the 50 largest banks in Southern California $412 billion
Number of Los Angeles neighborhoods without a single financial institution 46
Population of Los Angeles residents without access to a bank or credit union 500,000-600,000

bankshun

The number of banks in Los Angeles varies by neighbourhood

High-poverty neighbourhoods are disproportionately affected by the lack of financial institutions. Out of the five most populous neighbourhoods without a single financial institution – Central-Alameda, Green Meadows, Westmont, and Willowbrook – four are located in South Los Angeles and report significantly lower median household incomes than the County median of $56,196. These neighbourhoods have an aggregated median household income of $32,295 and are predominantly Black and Latino.

Low-income residents in Los Angeles County who are unbanked face even more financial challenges. For example, a resident of Green Meadows earning the annual median household income of $33,626 will have approximately $27,000 post-tax. With the median rent in Green Meadows being $1,080 per month, there is little discretionary income left after paying for food, healthcare, transportation, and education or job-related expenses. Because Green Meadows does not have a bank or credit union, residents have to spend money travelling to a different neighbourhood to cash their paychecks, and then spend more money on check-cashing fees.

Historically, diverse, low-income communities have been excluded from financial services through a practice of financial exclusion known as redlining. Wealthy, predominantly white neighbourhoods were outlined in green, reflecting low-risk neighbourhoods, while low-income, ethnically diverse neighbourhoods such as Boyle Heights and Central-Alameda in East and South Los Angeles were outlined in red, reflecting high-risk neighbourhoods. Redlining became known as de facto segregation and prevented these communities from accessing credit and formal financial institutions. Although redlining was outlawed in 1968 by the Fair Housing Act, the effects of this discriminatory practice lasted for generations and continue to impact the financial stability of many low-income communities across the nation.

Locating the Oxygen Sensor: Bank 1

You may want to see also

bankshun

Many residents in Los Angeles County lack access to banks

Los Angeles County is home to nearly 600,000 residents spread across 46 neighbourhoods that do not have access to a single bank or credit union. This means that one in five neighbourhoods in the county are considered ''banking deserts', defined as areas that lack sufficient access to financial institutions. Consequently, Angelenos in these areas face difficulties in carrying out basic financial tasks such as depositing paychecks, taking out loans, or writing checks for everyday expenses.

The absence of banks in these neighbourhoods has a significant impact on the financial stability of their residents, particularly those with low incomes. For example, a resident of Green Meadows earning the annual median household income of $33,626 would be left with little discretionary income after paying for essential expenses such as food, healthcare, transportation, and rent, which averages $1,080 per month. Due to the lack of banks in Green Meadows, this individual would need to spend approximately $750 a year to cash their bi-weekly paycheck at a local check-cashing location, incurring a 2.75% fee. This not only highlights the immediate financial burden of residing in a banking desert but also underscores the long-term opportunity cost of being unable to invest those savings.

The issue of limited access to banks in Los Angeles County is deeply rooted in historical practices of financial exclusion, particularly redlining. This discriminatory practice, which was outlawed in 1968 by the Fair Housing Act, involved ranking neighbourhoods by risk, with low-income, ethnically diverse areas outlined in red and deemed high-risk. As a result, these communities, predominantly Black and Latino, were systematically denied access to credit and formal financial institutions. Despite legislative changes, the legacy of redlining persists, and diverse, low-income communities in Los Angeles County continue to face challenges in accessing financial services.

To address this issue, initiatives such as the BankOn Los Angeles County coalition have been established. Managed by the County of Los Angeles Department of Consumer and Business Affairs' Center for Financial Empowerment, BankOn works with community organizations, county departments, and financial institutions to increase access to mainstream bank accounts. By providing residents with information about partner banks and credit unions that offer safe and affordable checking accounts, the program aims to empower individuals financially and help them avoid expensive alternative financial services.

bankshun

Redlining has historically prevented diverse, low-income communities from accessing banks

Los Angeles County is home to more than half a million residents who lack access to a single bank or credit union in their neighborhoods. This means that they cannot easily deposit paychecks, take out loans, or write checks for everyday expenses. This situation is known as living in a "banking desert". Nearly one in five neighborhoods in Los Angeles County does not have a financial institution, and out of the five most populous neighborhoods without access to banks, four are located in South Los Angeles and have significantly lower median household incomes than the county median. These neighborhoods are predominantly Black and Latino.

The historical practice of redlining has contributed significantly to the lack of access to financial institutions in diverse, low-income communities in Los Angeles and across the nation. Redlining refers to the practice of denying people credit and financial services based on where they live, even if they are personally qualified for loans. In the 1930s, government officials with the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation created maps that deemed certain neighborhoods “hazardous” for bank lending, with the leading causes of risk being the presence of African Americans or immigrants. Wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods were considered low risk, while low-income, ethnically diverse neighborhoods such as Boyle Heights and Central-Alameda in East and South Los Angeles were marked as high risk. This practice quickly became known as de facto segregation and prevented these communities from accessing credit and formal financial institutions.

While redlining was outlawed in 1968 by the Fair Housing Act, which tasked federal financial regulators with enforcement, the effects of this discriminatory practice have lasted for generations and continue to impact the financial stability of many low-income communities. Redlining has contributed to the long-term decline of inner-city neighborhoods and the persistence of ethnic minority enclaves. Additionally, predatory lending practices through reverse redlining have stripped wealth from these communities, as seen in the surge of subprime lending before the 2008 financial crisis.

Despite legal obligations under the Community Reinvestment Act for banks to lend to all segments of their communities, modern-day redlining persists. A year-long analysis of Home Mortgage Disclosure Act records found a pattern of troubling denials for people of color across major metropolitan areas. African Americans and Latinos continue to face resistance in obtaining loans, even in neighborhoods that have gentrified and become majority-white. These discriminatory lending practices contribute to the homeownership gap between whites and people of color and hinder economic stability for diverse, low-income communities.

bankshun

The largest banks in Southern California ranked by assets

Los Angeles County is home to more than 600,000 residents who do not have access to a single bank or credit union within their neighborhoods. This means that many Angelenos are unable to deposit paychecks, take out loans, or write checks for everyday household expenses. These "banking deserts" are often low-income, ethnically diverse neighborhoods that have historically been excluded from financial services through a practice known as "redlining," which is a form of de facto segregation that prevents communities from accessing credit and formal financial institutions.

Despite these challenges, Southern California is also home to some of the largest banks in the region, with the top 50 banks headquartered in the region holding a combined total of $412 billion in assets. These banks employ more than 6,400 people and operate over 300 branches.

  • Bank of America: With headquarters in Charlotte, North Carolina, Bank of America is one of the largest banks in the United States. While not exclusively based in Southern California, it has a strong presence in the region and is among the top banks by assets.
  • Wells Fargo: Wells Fargo is another major US bank with a significant presence in Southern California. With its headquarters in San Francisco, California, Wells Fargo has a long history in the state and is a key player in the region's banking industry.
  • Chase Bank: JPMorgan Chase Bank, commonly known as Chase, is a global financial institution with a strong foothold in Southern California. It is one of the Big Four banks in the United States and has a significant presence in the region.
  • U.S. Bank: U.S. Bancorp, with its headquarters in Minneapolis, Minnesota, has a widespread network across the country, including Southern California. It is consistently ranked as one of the largest banks by assets and has a notable presence in the region.
  • Union Bank: Union Bank, a member of the Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, has a strong presence in Southern California. While it may not be one of the "Big Four" banks, it is a significant financial institution in the region with a large customer base.

These banks not only offer traditional banking services but also provide a range of financial products and services, contributing to the economic landscape of Southern California. It is worth noting that the rankings may change over time as the financial landscape is dynamic, and the information presented here reflects the state of the industry as of December 31, 2024.

bankshun

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's (FDIC) survey of unbanked households in LA

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) has been conducting a biennial survey of unbanked and underbanked households in the United States since 2009, in partnership with the U.S. Census Bureau. The survey aims to measure the use of banking and financial products and services, and it has become an important tool for understanding the financial landscape of the country.

The 2023 FDIC National Survey of Unbanked and Underbanked Households revealed that 4.2% of U.S. households, or about 5.6 million households, were unbanked. This means that no one in these households had a checking or savings account at a bank or credit union. While this number represents a decrease from the previous survey years, it still translates to millions of people who are unable to access traditional banking services.

The survey also found that lower-income, less-educated, Black, Hispanic, disabled, and single-parent households were significantly more likely to be unbanked. Additionally, two-thirds of unbanked households relied entirely on cash transactions, while a third used prepaid cards or non-bank online payment services. These findings highlight the financial challenges faced by unbanked households and their reliance on alternative financial tools.

In Los Angeles County, the issue of unbanked households is particularly acute, with nearly one in five neighbourhoods lacking a single financial institution. This means that approximately 600,000 residents in 46 neighbourhoods across the county do not have access to banks or credit unions. The FDIC survey found that 57% of unbanked households in LA cited "not having enough money to keep in an account" as the main reason for not using banks. Other reasons included a lack of trust in banks and high bank fees.

The consequences of being unbanked can be significant, as it not only affects an individual's ability to conduct basic financial transactions but also their long-term financial stability. For example, a resident of Green Meadows, an unbanked neighbourhood in LA, would spend approximately $750 a year to cash their paychecks at a local check-cashing location. This is money that could have been invested in a retirement account, accruing interest over time.

Frequently asked questions

It is unclear exactly how many banks are in Los Angeles, but there are at least 12 banks headquartered in Los Angeles County.

Some banks in Los Angeles include the Bank of Hope, the Bank of the Sierra, and the Savings Bank of Mendocino County.

Yes, nearly one in five neighborhoods in Los Angeles County do not have a single financial institution, such as a bank or credit union.

Diverse, low-income communities have historically been excluded from financial services through a practice known as redlining. Today, nearly 600,000 residents in 46 neighborhoods across LA County do not have access to banks or credit unions, with four of the five most populous affected neighborhoods located in South Los Angeles.

A lack of banks in an area can make it difficult for residents to deposit paychecks, take out loans, or write checks for household expenses. It can also impact the financial stability of the community, as residents may have to spend more money on check-cashing services and may be prevented from investing in retirement accounts.

Written by
Reviewed by

Explore related products

47 Men's Retro

$31 $34.4

Share this post
Print
Did this article help you?

Leave a comment