
The Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) has been a contentious issue, with many individuals and organizations seeking to influence the banks financing the project. If you're looking to contact the 17 banks involved with DAPL, it's essential to have a clear understanding of your objectives and the most effective methods for reaching out. These banks, which include major financial institutions such as Wells Fargo, Citibank, and Bank of America, have been targeted by activists and concerned citizens through various means, including email campaigns, phone calls, and social media outreach. To successfully contact these banks, you'll need to research their specific contact information, decision-makers, and preferred communication channels, as well as craft a clear and concise message that outlines your concerns and desired outcomes related to the DAPL project.
Explore related products
What You'll Learn
- Find bank contact info (websites, phone numbers, emails for 17 banks funding DAPL)
- Use social media (Twitter, Facebook handles for direct DAPL-related bank engagement)
- Email templates (Sample messages to banks regarding DAPL concerns)
- Call scripts (Prepared dialogues for discussing DAPL with bank representatives)
- Organize campaigns (Petitions, letters, and actions targeting DAPL-funding banks)

Find bank contact info (websites, phone numbers, emails for 17 banks funding DAPL)
To find bank contact info (websites, phone numbers, emails for 17 banks funding DAPL), start by identifying the banks involved in financing the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL). A widely referenced list includes banks such as Wells Fargo, Citibank, Bank of America, and JPMorgan Chase, among others. Once you have the list, visit each bank’s official website, which is the most reliable source for accurate contact information. Most banks prominently display their customer service phone numbers, email addresses, and physical branch locations on their homepages or in a "Contact Us" section. For example, Wells Fargo’s website provides a dedicated page for customer support, while Citibank offers a global contact directory for inquiries.
Next, search for specific departments or executives within these banks who handle corporate responsibility, investor relations, or environmental concerns. Many banks have dedicated teams for stakeholder engagement, and their contact details can often be found in the "About Us" or "Investor Relations" sections of their websites. For instance, Bank of America provides an email address for environmental, social, and governance (ESG) inquiries, which can be useful for addressing DAPL-related concerns. Additionally, use search engines to find publicly available emails or phone numbers for key executives, as these are often shared in financial reports or press releases.
If direct contact information is not readily available on the bank’s website, utilize third-party resources such as LinkedIn, Bloomberg, or corporate databases like Crunchbase. LinkedIn can help you find contact details for specific employees or department heads, while Bloomberg Terminal provides detailed corporate information, including contact details for investor relations teams. Another useful resource is the bank’s annual report or sustainability report, which often includes contact information for corporate responsibility inquiries.
For a more streamlined approach, refer to advocacy group websites that have compiled contact information for banks funding DAPL. Organizations like BankTrack, Sierra Club, or Greenpeace often provide ready-made lists of bank contacts, including phone numbers, emails, and social media handles. These resources are particularly helpful for individuals looking to take immediate action, as they save time and ensure accuracy.
Finally, leverage social media platforms to find additional contact methods. Most banks maintain active profiles on Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram, where they often provide customer service support. Direct messaging or tweeting at these banks can be an effective way to get a response. Additionally, many banks have dedicated social media accounts for corporate responsibility or sustainability initiatives, which can be more relevant for DAPL-related inquiries. By combining these methods, you can efficiently gather the necessary contact information for the 17 banks funding DAPL.
AIB's Data Sharing: US Banks' Access
You may want to see also
Explore related products

Use social media (Twitter, Facebook handles for direct DAPL-related bank engagement)
Social media platforms like Twitter and Facebook are powerful tools for direct engagement with banks involved in the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL). Many banks maintain active profiles on these platforms, making them accessible for public inquiries, feedback, and advocacy efforts. To begin, identify the official Twitter and Facebook handles of the 17 banks financing DAPL. These handles are typically listed on the banks' official websites or can be found through a simple search on the platforms themselves. Once you have the handles, craft clear and concise messages that directly address the banks' involvement in DAPL. For example, you might tweet, "@[BankHandle] Why are you still financing the Dakota Access Pipeline despite its environmental and human rights concerns? #DefundDAPL #ClimateAction."
When using Twitter, leverage hashtags like #DefundDAPL, #NoDAPL, or #ClimateJustice to increase visibility and connect with a broader audience. Tagging the bank’s handle ensures your message appears on their notifications and public timeline, making it harder for them to ignore. On Facebook, you can post directly on the bank’s page or comment on their recent posts to highlight their DAPL ties. For instance, "As a customer, I’m deeply concerned about [BankName]’s continued support for the Dakota Access Pipeline. Will you commit to withdrawing funding for this harmful project?" Be respectful yet firm in your tone to maintain credibility while conveying urgency.
Consistency is key when engaging banks on social media. Regularly post, retweet, or share content that highlights the environmental and social impacts of DAPL, tagging the banks in each post. Coordinate with advocacy groups or use pre-made graphics and templates to amplify your message. Additionally, encourage others to join the effort by sharing their own stories or concerns. For example, "Join me in asking @[BankHandle] to stop funding the Dakota Access Pipeline. Our voices matter! #DefundDAPL." This collective pressure can create a sustained campaign that banks will find difficult to overlook.
Another effective strategy is to respond directly to the banks' social media posts, even if they are unrelated to DAPL. For instance, if a bank tweets about sustainability initiatives, reply with, "How can [BankName] claim to support sustainability while financing the Dakota Access Pipeline? It’s time to align your actions with your words. #DefundDAPL." This approach ensures your message reaches their audience and challenges their public image. Similarly, on Facebook, comment on their posts about community engagement or corporate responsibility, linking it back to their DAPL involvement.
Finally, document and share the banks' responses (or lack thereof) to your social media engagement. If a bank ignores your messages, publicly call out their silence. For example, "It’s been [X] days since we asked @[BankHandle] about their DAPL funding, and still no response. What are they hiding? #DefundDAPL." This transparency holds banks accountable and encourages others to join the campaign. By strategically using Twitter and Facebook, you can create a public dialogue that pressures banks to address their role in DAPL financing.
Activate Message Bank on NBN: A Simple Step-by-Step Guide
You may want to see also
Explore related products

Email templates (Sample messages to banks regarding DAPL concerns)
Paragraph 1:
Subject: Urgent Request to Divest from Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) Funding
Dear [Bank Name] Executive Team,
I am writing to express my deep concern regarding your institution’s financial involvement in the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL). As a [customer/stakeholder/concerned citizen], I urge you to immediately cease all funding and financial support for this project. DAPL poses significant environmental risks, including the threat of oil spills that could contaminate water sources for millions, and it violates the treaty rights and sovereignty of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe. By continuing to finance this project, [Bank Name] is complicit in these harms and undermines its stated commitments to sustainability and social responsibility. I respectfully request that you publicly commit to divesting from DAPL and adopt policies that prevent future investments in fossil fuel infrastructure. Your actions will not only protect communities and ecosystems but also align with the growing global demand for ethical banking practices.
Paragraph 2:
Subject: Call to Action: End Financial Support for DAPL
To the Leadership of [Bank Name],
I am reaching out to demand that [Bank Name] withdraw its financial support for the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL). This pipeline has been a source of ongoing environmental injustice, disregarding Indigenous rights and endangering vital water resources. As someone who values ethical banking, I am deeply disappointed to learn of your institution’s involvement in this controversial project. I urge you to take immediate steps to divest from DAPL and to implement transparent policies that ensure no future investments contribute to similar harms. Your customers and the public are increasingly holding banks accountable for their role in climate change and social inequities. By taking decisive action, [Bank Name] can demonstrate its commitment to a just and sustainable future. I look forward to your prompt response and concrete steps toward addressing these concerns.
Paragraph 3:
Subject: Reevaluate Your Role in Funding the Dakota Access Pipeline
Dear [Bank Name] Sustainability Team,
I am writing to bring attention to the urgent need for [Bank Name] to reevaluate its financial support for the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL). This project has been widely criticized for its environmental risks, disregard for Indigenous rights, and contribution to climate change. As a [customer/investor/advocate], I am deeply troubled by your institution’s association with such a harmful endeavor. I urge you to conduct a thorough review of your investments and commit to divesting from DAPL immediately. Additionally, I encourage [Bank Name] to adopt a clear policy against financing fossil fuel projects that threaten communities and the planet. Your leadership in this area could set a positive example for the banking industry and restore trust among your stakeholders. Thank you for your attention to this critical matter.
Paragraph 4:
Subject: Demand for Transparency and Accountability Regarding DAPL Funding
Dear [Bank Name] Customer Relations Team,
I am contacting you to express my concerns about [Bank Name]’s financial ties to the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL). As a [customer/account holder], I am deeply disturbed by the environmental and social impacts of this project, including its violation of Indigenous rights and potential for catastrophic oil spills. I request full transparency regarding your institution’s involvement in DAPL funding and urge you to take immediate steps to divest from this project. Furthermore, I encourage [Bank Name] to adopt a public commitment to avoid financing similar fossil fuel infrastructure in the future. Your actions will not only protect affected communities but also align with the growing expectation for banks to prioritize sustainability and ethical practices. I await your response and hope to see meaningful action on this issue.
Paragraph 5:
Subject: Join the Movement to Defund the Dakota Access Pipeline
To the [Bank Name] Corporate Responsibility Team,
I am writing to urge [Bank Name] to join the growing movement of financial institutions divesting from the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL). This pipeline has caused irreparable harm to Indigenous communities, threatened water sources, and exacerbated climate change. By continuing to fund DAPL, your bank is contributing to these injustices and undermining its own sustainability goals. I call on [Bank Name] to immediately cease all financial support for this project and to publicly commit to ending investments in fossil fuel infrastructure. As a [customer/advocate], I believe that banks have a moral and ethical responsibility to prioritize the well-being of people and the planet over profit. I look forward to seeing [Bank Name] take a stand on the right side of history.
Paragraph 6:
Subject: A Plea to Protect Our Planet and Communities: Divest from DAPL
Dear [Bank Name] Leadership,
I am writing to express my profound disappointment in [Bank Name]’s decision to financially support the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL). This project has been a source of immense harm, from its disregard for Indigenous sovereignty to its environmental risks. As someone who values ethical banking, I urge you to reconsider your involvement and take immediate steps to divest from DAPL. By doing so, [Bank Name] can demonstrate its commitment to protecting communities, preserving ecosystems, and combating climate change. I encourage you to adopt policies that prevent future investments in harmful fossil fuel projects and to prioritize sustainable alternatives. Your actions matter, and I hope to see [Bank Name] lead by example in this critical moment.
Food Banks: What Documents Do You Need?
You may want to see also

Call scripts (Prepared dialogues for discussing DAPL with bank representatives)
Paragraph 1:
"Hello, my name is [Your Name], and I’m calling regarding [Bank Name]’s involvement in financing the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL). I understand that your bank is one of the 17 financial institutions supporting this project. As a customer and stakeholder, I’m deeply concerned about the environmental and social risks associated with DAPL, including its impact on Indigenous communities and water resources. Could you please provide clarity on your bank’s current position regarding continued financing of this pipeline? I’d appreciate specific details on whether [Bank Name] plans to renew or withdraw its financial support."
Paragraph 2:
"I’m reaching out to express my serious concerns about [Bank Name]’s role in funding the Dakota Access Pipeline. As someone who values sustainability and ethical banking, I’m troubled by the pipeline’s violation of Indigenous rights and its potential for catastrophic oil spills. I’ve read that [Bank Name] has policies in place to address environmental and social governance (ESG) risks. Could you explain how financing DAPL aligns with these policies? Additionally, I’d like to know if the bank has considered divesting from this project in response to public and shareholder pressure."
Paragraph 3:
"I’m calling today to discuss [Bank Name]’s financial ties to the Dakota Access Pipeline. As a customer, I’m concerned about the reputational and financial risks this investment poses to the bank, especially given the ongoing legal challenges and public opposition to DAPL. I’d like to know if [Bank Name] has conducted a thorough risk assessment of this project and whether it plans to phase out its financing. If not, I’d urge the bank to reconsider its involvement and prioritize investments in renewable energy instead. Could you share any updates on the bank’s stance?"
Paragraph 4:
"My name is [Your Name], and I’m contacting [Bank Name] to discuss its role in financing the Dakota Access Pipeline. I’m particularly concerned about the pipeline’s impact on the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and its water supply. As a customer, I believe it’s crucial for the bank to respect Indigenous rights and transition away from fossil fuel projects. I’d like to know if [Bank Name] has engaged in dialogue with affected communities or taken steps to address these concerns. If not, I’d strongly encourage the bank to do so and to publicly commit to ending its financial support for DAPL."
Paragraph 5:
"I’m calling to inquire about [Bank Name]’s continued involvement in the Dakota Access Pipeline. As someone who values ethical banking, I’m disappointed to see the bank associated with a project that has caused significant harm to Indigenous communities and the environment. I’d like to know if [Bank Name] has plans to withdraw its financing or if it intends to remain invested in DAPL. If the bank chooses the latter, I’ll need to reconsider my relationship with [Bank Name] and explore other financial institutions that align better with my values. Could you provide any information on this?"
Paragraph 6:
"Hello, I’m [Your Name], and I’m reaching out regarding [Bank Name]’s financing of the Dakota Access Pipeline. I’ve been a customer for [X years], and I’m deeply concerned about the bank’s involvement in a project that threatens water resources and violates Indigenous sovereignty. I’d like to know if [Bank Name] has considered the long-term risks of this investment, both to the environment and to its own reputation. I’d also appreciate information on any steps the bank has taken to address these concerns. If [Bank Name] continues to support DAPL, I’ll have no choice but to move my accounts to a more responsible institution."
Colonial Virginia's Banking System: A Historical Overview of Financial Institutions
You may want to see also

Organize campaigns (Petitions, letters, and actions targeting DAPL-funding banks)
Organizing campaigns to target banks funding the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) requires a strategic and multi-faceted approach. Begin by identifying the 17 banks known to be involved in financing the project. This information can often be found through public records, financial reports, or advocacy organizations tracking DAPL investments. Once you have the list, create a centralized resource—such as a website or social media page—to share this information with activists, customers of these banks, and the general public. Transparency is key to building awareness and mobilizing action.
Petitions are a powerful tool to engage a broad audience and demonstrate public opposition to DAPL funding. Draft clear, concise petitions targeting each bank individually, demanding they withdraw financial support for the pipeline. Use platforms like Change.org, MoveOn, or dedicated advocacy websites to host these petitions. Ensure each petition includes specific asks, such as divesting from DAPL or adopting policies against funding fossil fuel projects. Promote these petitions through social media, email campaigns, and partnerships with environmental and Indigenous rights organizations to maximize reach and signatures.
Alongside petitions, organize letter-writing campaigns to directly pressure bank executives and board members. Provide templates for letters or emails that customers and activists can personalize and send to bank leadership. Highlight the environmental, social, and ethical risks associated with DAPL funding, including violations of Indigenous sovereignty and climate impacts. Encourage participants to share their concerns as customers or stakeholders, emphasizing the potential for reputational damage and financial consequences if the bank continues its involvement. Coordinate mass mailing days to create a surge of correspondence that banks cannot ignore.
Direct actions and public demonstrations are another critical component of these campaigns. Organize protests, sit-ins, or flash mobs outside bank branches, particularly those in high-visibility areas. Collaborate with local Indigenous groups, environmental organizations, and community leaders to ensure actions are culturally sensitive and impactful. Use creative visuals, such as banners, signs, and mock oil spills, to draw attention to the issue. Additionally, consider organizing divestment campaigns, encouraging customers to close their accounts with DAPL-funding banks and switch to ethical financial institutions. Publicize these actions through media outreach to amplify the message and pressure banks to respond.
Finally, leverage social media and digital tools to sustain momentum and engage a global audience. Launch targeted hashtags, such as #DefundDAPL or #BankExit, to unify campaigns across platforms. Share regular updates, infographics, and success stories to keep participants informed and motivated. Use email newsletters and action alerts to mobilize supporters for specific tasks, such as calling bank customer service lines or attending local events. By combining petitions, letters, direct actions, and digital activism, these campaigns can create sustained pressure on DAPL-funding banks and drive meaningful change.
Can You Overdraft with Norway Savings Bank? Here's What to Know
You may want to see also
Frequently asked questions
You can contact the 17 banks through their official customer service channels, including phone, email, or physical mail. Many banks also have dedicated pages on their websites for feedback or inquiries. Additionally, advocacy groups often provide templates and contact information for coordinated campaigns.
The 17 banks include major institutions like Wells Fargo, Citibank, and Bank of America. You can find their contact details on their official websites, annual reports, or through financial databases. Advocacy organizations like BankTrack also provide lists and contact information for these banks.
Yes, many banks are active on social media platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn. You can tag them in posts or send direct messages to express your concerns. However, for formal inquiries, it’s best to use their official customer service channels.
Yes, several environmental and Indigenous rights organizations, such as the Sierra Club and Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, have launched campaigns and petitions targeting these banks. Joining these efforts can amplify your voice and increase the impact of your message.
Be clear and concise. Mention your concerns about the environmental and social impacts of DAPL, urge the bank to divest from the project, and consider including personal reasons for your stance. If you’re a customer, mention that and explain how their involvement affects your trust in their institution.

















